Liquidity Trap

نویسنده

  • Sheila C. Dow
چکیده

The economic situation in a wide range of economies in the wake of the crisis that began in 2007 is characterised by many as a liquidity trap. The original conceptualization of the liquidity trap was part of Keynes’s (1936) theory of liquidity preference. It referred to a situation where the monetary authorities could not reduce the nominal long-term interest rate any further by selling bonds because of the near universal expectation that interest rates were so low that they could only rise and bond prices fall. “There is the possibility [...] that, after the rate of interest has fallen to a certain level, liquidity-preference may become virtually absolute in the sense that almost everyone prefers cash to holding a debt which yields so low a rate of interest. In this event the monetary authority would have lost effective control over the rate of interest” (Keynes, 1936, p. 207). In principle, the liquidity trap could arise at any interest rate; the critical factor was that a conventional expectation should have been formed that interest rates would not fall further. Given that such a belief was formed under uncertainty, it was potentially volatile. But Keynes had proceeded to explain that, while a liquidity trap had occurred under special circumstances, it was in general unlikely.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Asset-Liability Management and Liquidity Trap (Case Study: Credit Institute for Development)

An increase in the ability to timely meet commitments which will be due in the near future is a prerequisite for the survival of banks. Hence, the correct and optimal management of liquidity is an important affair that banks should perform. The present study aimed mainly to test the management of asset-liability and liquidity trap in the Credit Institute for Development. The research is applied...

متن کامل

Liquidity Deflation and Liquidity Trap under Flexible Prices

I discuss some simple microfoundations for Liquidity Deflation, a concept put forward in Calvo (2016 a and b), which can give rise to liquidity trap conditions under perfectly flexible prices. Unlike in Keynes (1936), this is a Supply Side Liquidity Trap. Moreover, modeling the policy interest rate as the rate of return on money-like instruments à la Calvo and Végh (1995), denoted by i!, I show...

متن کامل

Supply-Side Liquidity Trap, Deflation Bias and Flat Phillips Curve

The paper shows that Liquidity Deflation, a liquidity-drainage mechanism associated with Safe Asset Shortage, helps to rationalize supply-side liquidity trap and involuntary unemployment under wage/price flexibility, especially in economies that suffered massive liquidity destruction, like advanced economies in the wake of the Lehman crisis. Moreover, Liquidity Deflation is shown to imply defla...

متن کامل

Understanding Benign Liquidity Traps: The Case of Japan

Japan has been in a benign liquidity trap since the 1990s. In a benign liquidity trap, interest rates approach zero and monetary policy is ineffective but output and employment perform decently. Such a pattern contradicts traditional macro theories. This paper introduces a monetary general equilibrium model that is compatible with Japan’s performance and resolves puzzles associated with liquidi...

متن کامل

Money and Production, and Liquidity Trap

We prove the existence of monetary equilibrium in a finite horizon economy with production. We also show that if agents expect the monetary authority to significantly decrease the supply of bank money available for short term loans in the future, then the economy will fall into a liquidity trap today.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015